Quote:
Originally Posted by GullFoss
The flames clearly have a #6 spot open on their roster. Unless that spot is for Parekh, Hanley or Pachal...there is a spot open that Kylington could presumably fill.
|
Meh. I don't really see him as a long term answer on the club and anything beyond 1-2 years on his next deal is not only risky, but doesn't fit with where the club is headed. He's 27 now and is what he is. If the price and term was right, I would be fine with it. It looks like it probably wasn't and I'm glad Conroy is sticking to his guns here.
It's actually somewhat weird that Kylington wouldn't have signed a 1 year deal as he really has a lot further to go in his comeback than merely suiting up for 30 games and expecting a long term commitment from anyone, let alone the Flames seems a bit strange.