Quote:
Originally Posted by HOZ
Umm.... maybe you should try and understand my quotes before trolling me.
I did attack Mikey's movie quality. He does not even have the slightest integriy, honesty or fairness whatsoever. (Attacking the quality of the movie)
I didn't say his movie sucks because he is a champaigne-socialist wanker and hypocrit that lives in a 80,000 a month apartment in Manhanttan. (ad-hominem)
Understand?
|
From your own words:
Quote:
|
Ad hominem - the attack on the person and not his ideas
|
You said Moore's movie quality is bad because he "does not even have the slightest integriy, honesty or fairness whatsoever". Without seeing the movie you have already dimissed the message based on your opinion of its creator.
Quote:
|
I did attack Mikey's movie quality. He does not even have the slightest integriy, honesty or fairness whatsoever. (Attacking the quality of the movie)
|
If you were really attacking the quality of the movie and not Moore, why begin your sentence with 'he', a pronoun refering to a person, instead of 'it', a pronoun refering to a thing.
This is not specifically directed at you -- there is a lot of it in this thread -- but I don't think its fair to dimiss everything this movie has to say, before even seeing it, based solely on one's opinion of Michael Moore.