Quote:
Originally Posted by Jiri Hrdina
All we know is that one GM was prepared to pay a 2nd now, after the player being shopped for some time.
If that GM fills his need elsewhere, including by spending that 2nd, why do you think another GM would automatically ALSO be willing to pay a 2nd for him?
Just because one GM offered a 2nd, doesn't mean others will in the future.
|
Right. But one instance of something is actually evidence
for it happening again. This is called induction.
Induction is a form of reasoning where past instances of an event happening lead us to believe that similar events will occur in the future.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jiri Hrdina
They jumped at the offer, which suggests this is the first time a 2nd has actually been on the table.
|
Don't think we know this? What is your source?