Quote:
Originally Posted by Maritime Q-Scout
That was onside.
Now if the was offside and challeneged, I could see how it would be upheld.
But like... that seemed onside to me period, let alone there not being enough to overturn.
That's insane.
Yes, I want the Oilers to lose, but taking a step back, I think that was indeed onside.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zach
Get some glasses imo
|
It was the right call.
In real time it appeared the puck was higher up the blade of the stick than it was.
In fairness, given the razor thin margin, if anyone thinks someone "needs glasses" by having this call mistaken, they're the one that needs their eyes checked as obviously you're seeing what you want to see.
