Quote:
Originally Posted by WinnipegFan
So did some digging on the website as I was curious got this:
https://ibb.co/wQ70dbL
Is e and f really acceptable. I mean they are removing their responsibility from basic reasonable care??? |
E sounds like covering their arse for human nature. Is their a parent that hasn't done something negligent at some point(typically with zero negative consequences)? Basically "our supervisors are human, and may be looking the other way when your kid trips over a stump".
F is just an extension of that, so parents understand that no, their is not a helicopter guardian 24/7 and they may be "not actively supervised" at points.
This just looks like lawyers in the modern world lawyering to me, but maybe I'm out to lunch.