Quote:
Originally Posted by ForeverFlameFan
Your cost/benefit analysis is correct, however, I still don’t see NJ moving that 10th OA pick unless we are taking back some major salary. I think New Jersey would be doing everything they can do retain the 10th OA pick, select a top prospect, and offer Holtz and 2025 1st instead. Which honestly, I’d be A okay with, since we already have a 1st from Vancouver in this draft. And there’s so much depth in this draft where our 28th OA pick can potentially be just as good as who we were going to select at 10.
|
As would I, it would insure 2x 1st rounders the next 3 drafts