Quote:
Originally Posted by fotze2
Totally a two though buds. Def a 2 on the risk scale. Two all day
|
It was a joke about how we got here. Go read the post again.
Your comparison between this and the AER is pretty ridiculous though. It’s a completely different consequence.
But currently the outcome has been inconvenience so the risk mitigation strategy employed seems to be working even though I agree a proper risk assessment of an unmitigated failure like this would be catastrophic (I didn’t think I’d have to actually say this) but low likelihood so you inspect and have spare parts for repairs and an emergency response plan to mitigate and redundancy in the system to limit the consequence.
The city appears to be doing a reasonable job and prior to this failure had started to look and monitor for this type of failure.