Quote:
Originally Posted by dissentowner
Multiple media outlets have speculated on the base being a Markstrom for #10 as the basis of a deal. I am sure there are other components. Saying a future lottery protected 1st and a young player the team has been trying to give away as too much to be included in a deal for Markstrom is just putting down our assets which is right up your alley, isn't it?
|
Are you talking Mercer or Holtz? Who did I put down? Also can you show me which media outlets have been saying the market for Markstrom is a 1st and top prospect or young roster player?
I literally said 10th OA for a retained Markstrom is fair value. A lottery protected 1st and Holtz gets it done as well.
It's the talk of ++ or wanting an asset like Mercer that is ridiculous.
I would be interested to see what team has traded a potential 2nd line C for a 35 year old goalie.