Quote:
Originally Posted by The Cobra
It seems to assume each player has negative value.
Chicago needs to move a mid round 2nd to get rid of Bedard. I’d say Calgary should take on that bad boy.
|
Um, no. It's saying that if somebody (Chicago or a 3rd party) retained 50% of Bedard's contract, that money would be worth a mid-round 2nd. It says nothing at all about the value of the player, or whether the GM would be fired into the sun for even thinking about trading him.