Quote:
Originally Posted by Pointman
I'm still waiting for a quote from the original Al Jazeera article that claims - let alone proves - that they owned that house. If not, how can you call it a theft? How can you claim an "illegal displacement" if they were asked to either pay the rent or move out? Isn't it legal practice in all countries? It's not about papers and technicalities, they in fact never owned it. All they have is that they were allegedly promised to own it "after three years"and that alleged promise was made before 1967. I will not move to read another article until we are done discussing the first one.
|
Maybe you should learn what is and isn’t legal under international law and what displacement means. Until you do, there isn’t really anything discuss. And I’m actually shocked you don’t, since you pretend to be knowledgeable about these issues.
If the people who the homes were built for and who lived in the homes didn’t own them, then who did between 1967 and when they were kicked out half a century later? Use your brain here.