Quote:
Originally Posted by Zary's-Mustache
So honest question what's the difference between people thinking Israel doesn't have the right to exist and Israel not allowing a Palestinian state to exist?
I, for one, believe Israel should exist. No country has the right to exist. You either exist, or you don't.
People of all faith have the right to exist and live in peace in whatever borders they live in.
But don't see why there is outrage for the question asked especially when the Israel government literally does not let a Palestinian state exist.
More hypocrisy and trying to be a victim.
|
Easy, Palestine has been offered a state numerous times and turned it down each time in favor of violent bloodshed. You're spreading what is known as "bull####" by saying nonsense like "Israel has stopped Palestine from having a state". Does it make you happy inside to blatantly lie?
1919: Arabs of Palestine refused nominate representatives to the Paris Peace Conference.
1920: San Remo conference decisions, rejected.
1922: League of Nations decisions, rejected.
1937: Peel Commission partition proposal, rejected.
1938: Woodhead partition proposal, rejected
1947: UN General Assembly partition proposal (UNGAR 181), rejected.
1949: Israel's outstretched hand for peace (UNGAR 194), rejected.
1967: Israel's outstretched hand for peace (UNSCR 242), rejected.
1978: Begin/Sa’adat peace proposal, rejected (except for Egypt).
1994: Rabin/Hussein peace agreement, rejected by the rest of the Arab League (except for Egypt).
1995: Rabin's Contour-for-Peace, rejected.
2000: Barak/Clinton peace offer, rejected.
2001: Barak’s offer at Taba, rejected.
2005: Sharon's peace gesture, withdrawal from Gaza, rejected.
2008: Olmert/Bush peace offer, rejected.
2009 to present: Netanyahu's repeated invitations to peace talks, rejected.
2014: Kerry's Contour-for-Peace, rejected.
The real problem is Palestine refuses to accept the state of Israel existing, they want all of the land for themselves and will never agree to live beside Israel.