Quote:
Originally Posted by Jay Random
OK, then. At that point, the disagreement is about what the Flames would give up to acquire him, not about the player himself.
I agree that it would be ridiculous to give up the #9 pick for Necas, and silly to include #28 unless there are also picks and/or good prospects coming back. But I can see the rationale for spending a later pick (somebody mentioned a 2nd) to convert one of the Flames' older roster players into a younger and better roster player.
In any case, I'm not breaking out my torch and pitchfork until I see what (if anything) actually happens.
|
I just don’t see the point of adding a Necas. We aren’t competing for the playoffs next season.
No one has said who we are retooling around. Conroy actions as you said yourself are much different than what he says. All his trades thus far are rebuilding trades.
Adding a Necas makes sense for a team with a core built, and looking to add to take the next step in the playoffs. Like Florida when they got Reinhart.
We should be focused on making all of our picks, and adding more picks before we entertain moving any assets for any players.
Nothing has happened yet. No pitchforks out from my end. Just think he doesn’t fit the timeline of this team.