Quote:
Originally Posted by Paulie Walnuts
I’ve said that if it’s a hockey trade yes.
|
OK, then. At that point, the disagreement is about what the Flames would give up to acquire him, not about the player himself.
I agree that it would be ridiculous to give up the #9 pick for Necas, and silly to include #28 unless there are also picks and/or good prospects coming back. But I can see the rationale for spending a later pick (somebody mentioned a 2nd) to convert one of the Flames' older roster players into a younger and better roster player.
In any case, I'm not breaking out my torch and pitchfork until I see what (if anything) actually happens.