Quote:
Originally Posted by Rockin' Flames
I agree with this but I also think that every scientist has a bias and they can set out to try to prove that CO2 is causing global warming instead of trying to research that something else my be the cause for changes on the earth. It is just my opinion that this is what majority of scientists are doing.
|
Well if you want to hold the opinion that all the scientists that are proposing global warming is caused by mankind (and there are a lot of them) are in some sort of conspiracy then, fine, belief that. But you might have a hard time convincing people that is going on. I know you didn't say conspiracy, but that is basically what you are implying. If some science is shown to be bunk or incorrect then it will be published as such. According to what you are saying all these scientists are bias so they will somehow ignore that evidence and not look at other evidence.
Now what is more likely, thousands of bias scientists from multiple disciplines from around the world ignoring evidence and believing all evidence in their favour or the science actually being accurate? One seems a lot simpler and makes a lot more sense, in my opinion.