Quote:
Originally Posted by Burninator
But the great thing about the process of science is that both are being done at the same time. If your out to discover what is causing the earth to warm and you conduct a study and your data shows that C02 isn't causing the warming then you've arrived at a possible theory. Or if your data shows that C02 is causing the earth to warm then you've also arrived at a theory. It would be bias of a scientist to arbitrarily decide that global warming is false and try to disprove it. Rather it would be much better if that scientist either, test the data of the existing theory to see if it works or not, or test data and try to prove his own theory regarding the issue.
|
I agree with this but I also think that every scientist has a bias and they can set out to try to prove that CO2 is causing global warming instead of trying to research that something else my be the cause for changes on the earth. It is just my opinion that this is what majority of scientists are doing.