[Lanny_MacDonald]

Originally Posted by Rockin' Flames

Please show me where I said that Holocaust deniers must be provided equal time to air their side of the story. I NEVER said such a thing (for future reference I would kindly request that you do not put words in my mouth).

You said...

"... also think that if you are going to show a video show both sides and I think this is the best video at the moment that would show the other side of the argument."

"The bottom line is if someone doesn't want to show the other side of the debate using another video such as this one then maybe "An Inconvenient Truth" shouldn't be required to be shown in the classroom."

"The bottom line is if videos that are biased such as "An Inconvenient Truth" are shown in a public school the opposing view should also be presented to the students so that they can make their own choice of what they believe."

And most damningly...

"So if you are going to show propaganda explaining one side of such a highly debated issue or science you should be obligated to show an opposing view."

No words put in your mouth other than you own.

Just because you have been brainwashed by the entire Global warming movement doesn't mean that everyone else should be brainwashed by it.

Just because you are too f'n stupid to understand the imperical data presented, and the weak hackneyed science that has been presented to counter it, does not mean that other people do not have a much greater grasp on the subject matter than yourself.

Granted most scientists are on board but it doesn't mean that all scientists are on board with it. If it is really a science then should it really be referred to as a fact?

WTF??? When you fell down and banged your head did the science that proved gravity to be a fact have anything to do with it? Or are you still questioning that because a few fruit loops out there question this accepted "law" of physics? The holes in your logic are astounding.

The science is continually researched and worked on, so it is continually being improved and data sets continually expanded. The theory is becoming more and more of a "fact" than many like to admit, and THAT is what should concern us the most.

That would seem to indicate that there is no question that it isn't happening and it can not be disproved, which really indicates that it is no longer being treated properly by the scientific community.

What are you talking about??? Scientists continue to study this issue using independent research techniques and they continue to come up with similar data. But in your expert opinion they are not treating it appropriately???? What else do they need to do? Abandon their research and start all over again? What are you suggesting??? What is your point???