Quote:
Originally Posted by Doctorfever
Would it be naive to suggest that the funding was reintroduced because a different political party wanted to be looked favourably by some of its voters? In order to gain said votes?
I am not saying that is the case, nor do I have anything to back that claim up.
|
You never presented the alternative. Let me.
Would it be naive to suggest that the funding was stopped wrongly because a different political party wanted to be looked favourably by some of its voters? In order to gain said votes?
Or one was in the pockets of lobbyists and the other wasn't?
I am not saying that is the case, nor do I have anything to back that claim up.