The driving example wasn't meant to say you need a human level AI to drive a vehicle, just that I believe you do if you want it to drive just like a person. That's not a requirement, and as you point out, also not ideal. It was just an example to show the difference that exists.
IBM defines AGI: "Strong AI aims to create intelligent machines that are indistinguishable from the human mind. But just like a child, the AI machine would have to learn through input and experiences, constantly progressing and advancing its abilities over time."
But I do think there are many definitions and what may or may not be needed to get there. We can also accept that current AI doesn't need to be AGI to be very useful.
|