Quote:
Originally Posted by sketchyt
I think there's a little more to it. The article's message is about housing affordability eroding.
It is using Mr. DUI as a thematic proof point to highlight the messaging. I think we all agree this proof point is a hilariously bad one.
Bad proof points take away from the main message (even if the message is true).
To me, if anything, this article hurt the perception of housing affordability issues more than it was supposed to help because of a very poor choice of its main source.
|
Fair points, and thank you for the perspective., I understand where you're coming from. I do think certain posters are focusing too much on the subject example; the real content is on the charts and info later on in the article and the messaging of affordability (or lack thereof) as a whole. The CH did a terrible job with structuring it, agreed on that. Definitely appreciate your dialogue and respectful response.