Quote:
Originally Posted by combustiblefuel
That would be the correct way to call it . It should have been 5 vs 3 not a double minor. The penalties should have been served congruantly. It would still be served as like a double minor where if the team scores that would negate only 1 penalty. They were 2 different types of penalties not ones that were the same and could be assessed as a double minor.even if they were the same like roughing they can not be called a double minor as they were seperate incidents.
The nhl had a rule book they just don't call it to a t.
|
I'll add I thought it should have been at Least a 2 min slash and a double minor for elbowing at live speed. Upon review it should have been a 2 min 5v3 and 5 min majour resulting in 3 mins of 4v5 but If I reffed I'd call it by the books but the nhl and betting sites haven't paid me off yet.