View Single Post
Old 05-25-2024, 10:41 PM   #13
Arsenal14
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Arsenal14's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by butterfly View Post
- Rather than 1st = 30, 2nd = 29, etc., can you try using the values listed here? https://soundofhockey.com/2022/06/06...l-draft-picks/ My feeling is that it will enhance the differences between the more critical earlier picks.
Code:
                        Overall	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015	2014	2013
Bob McKenzie		100.2	101.2	102.7	101.6	100.4	100.3	100.2	94.9
Christopher Ralph	99.5				102.3	99.4	96.8
Craig Button		99.4	102.8	101.0	94.5	108.0	99.1	104.1	86.2
Eldon MacDonald		99.2				98.0	101.0	98.6	
Future Considerations	98.6	97.6	100.9	90.0	105.8	99.4	101.1	95.7
HockeyProspect.com	98.2	99.2	102.2	99.5	99.8		96.6	92.1
McKeen's		97.2	97.5	103.1	90.4	97.4	101.9	99.4	90.9
Last Word on Sports	96.7	97.1	97.6	83.9	106.0	98.9	97.0	
Ryan Kennedy		96.5	99.7		85.5	101.2	97.9	101.7	92.9
Ryan Pike		95.5	99.5		81.0	105.9
Scott Wheeler		95.2	93.5	97.0
Corey Pronman		95.1	100.6	89.7	83.7	97.6	98.2	101.5	94.7
ISS			94.3	97.9	97.0	83.0	101.4	97.3	90.0	93.8
With this weighting it's very clear that McKenzie matches the actual first picks of the draft most years. Congrats to cral12 who moves into second place. ISS still is terrible and Craig Button remains right near the top.

The 2016 draft provided lots of room to beat the actual GM results for any expert who had Juolevi, Puljujarvi and Alexander Nylander out of the top 10.

On the other end few of the experts did well in 2017 where teams picked Heiskanen/Makar/Pettersson at 3/4/5 and pretty much no rankings came close to matching that (McKenzie was close with those players at 3/4/7).
Arsenal14 is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Arsenal14 For This Useful Post: