Quote:
Originally Posted by ComixZone
No, that wasn’t the scenario that was proposed.
It was effectively spending depth picks, a depth prospect, and Markstrom to gain the 10th overall pick and then flipping that to gain 5th.
5th + 9th probably does more good for the building of this team than Markstrom, Pelletier, 28th, 41st, and 64th does. I also imagine that no team with those picks in the top-5/10 are evaluating those spots as a ‘toss up’.
|
I know what was proposed.
Would you trade 9 + 41 + Pelletier for 5?
Quality over quantity.
Your comparison of value doesn’t make sense, the 9th in the proposed scenario never changes hands.
It’s: 5 vs Markstrom (his market value), Pelletier, 28, 41, 64
If we’re saying Markstrom + 28 + 64 = 10, then it’s:
5 vs 10, Pelletier, 41
So, if that’s a no brainer, then I’m assuming we should trade 9 + Pelletier + 41 because that value has to be pretty close as well, right? At least in the “fair” range if a little less than a no brainer.