Quote:
Originally Posted by PepsiFree
So you would trade #9, #41, and Pelletier for #5?
In a draft where 4-12 are considered a toss-up?
Great asset management. I, too, love quality.
|
No, that wasn’t the scenario that was proposed.
It was effectively spending depth picks, a depth prospect, and Markstrom to gain the 10th overall pick and then flipping that to gain 5th.
5th + 9th probably does more good for the building of this team than Markstrom, Pelletier, 28th, 41st, and 64th does. I also imagine that no team with those picks in the top-5/10 are evaluating those spots as a ‘toss up’.