Quote:
Originally Posted by Fan69
I think that utah trade is terrible. If we need to add a first thats idiocy.
I cant believe no one would give a comparable without losing the Vancouver pick.
Six is great all for it but this isn’t a generational draft and what exactly do people think a top pair defence with a great contract would cost? Low first and a third??
That deal should he done without the van pick.
|
You could draft a dman that has potential to be better than Rasmus and is under control for 7 years rather than 2. You likely save huge cap, get a high-end prospect and if you draft well, speed up the rebuild process by a few years. We are dreaming if we think we are adding a top 10 pick and keeping 9 without giving up someone very good