Quote:
Originally Posted by CorsiHockeyLeague
Deliberately omitting key facts that the author knows of (he clearly does) and should know are relevant and would affect the reader's view of the events (he knows that too) is lying. It's not any better than attempting to influence the way those events come off by making things up out of whole cloth. It's intentionally dishonest, and while obviously intentional dishonesty favouring the Oilers is nothing new among the people who make money reporting on that team (Oiler media is basically Fox News but about stuff that doesn't really matter), it's still not something that the Athletic should be happy to feature on its website.
|
Goodness.
Or he just sees it as an overt cross check to the head area that warrants a suspension.