[Coach]

Originally Posted by Dion

I think she is. She has this backlog of eight substantive pending motions she has yet to decide. Further to that her rulings have been questioned with comments of she doesn't know what she's doing.



https://www.newsweek.com/aileen-cann...e-this-1898313

I don't understand how "judge was appointed by the defendant" is not enough to force a recusal in the first place. Same with the 3 appointees on the Supreme Court. Why are they allowed to have an opinion at all? There is a very clear conflict of interest.