"We have to be ready to change course. We have to be ready to adapt. We have to say we are wrong and let's do it right. We have to do research. This is all stuff fundamental religions can't do. And if environmentalism is a kind of fundamentalist religion, then that's not a good way to manage the environment. We need a scientific approach. Not a religious approach".
Isn't this what they call a "straw man argument"?
|