Quote:
Originally Posted by TOfan
My thought was:
Markstrom, Andersson, van 1st to Toronto for Marner
Marner to Utah for 6OA and Hayton.
Rationale, Toronto improves D&G while getting a future asset. Utah gets a 90-100 pt 27 year old RW, Flames get an addition top 10 pick and a young C. Conroy has specifically said that he’s Looking for young players who might be buried or need a change of scenery.
Reasons why it’s unlikely; Marner’s NMC, Flames might not want to move Andersson, Utah might not want to move the pick or Hayton.
I was just interested in throwing something out there for discussion.
|
The Toronto deal is a blatantly awful deal for Calgary.
Two years of Andersson at 4.55M >> 1 year of Marner at 10.9M