Quote:
Originally Posted by dustygoon
We can go from Button is terrible on one end to Button didn't have control over the draft and others are to blame on the other.
But in the middle is Button has had a LONG run at this and he doesn't set himself apart from being average. Why not try someone new?
He's like a passive index fund to me. Decent results, safe, but let's try someone else or a different structure.
We need to improve.
|
All depends where you put the weighting.
I think more recent results suggest the group is doing a bang up job. That Dom article with an objective measure said the same.
So I wouldn't make the change given the trajectory.
To me you go back to 2015 (first Trevling draft) and forward and it's a pretty good draft record.