Quote:
Originally Posted by Enoch Root
Agreed. But still bad, and still worse than the eye test. And, like all stats, results in some people thinking it's definitive.
|
It's not better than the eye test unless the eyes judging it are qualified to judge a goalies performance. It may not be scientific over a few games but over a larger sample size it is a very good tool. People can use the eye test but it has to be backed up with some measurable stats.