Quote:
Originally Posted by Fan69
No disrespect intended but i see a bit of a fundamental flaw. For our last two draft unless we had been picking top five its not reasonable to expect many picks to have played many games?
I think with the recency bias out it would look a little clearer unless im missing something?
|
Yeah, I think there needs to be factors for draft year and draft position to make things halfway comparable. As far as making qualifications based on management decisions or other intangibles, I would guess many teams could add asterisks to their draft records based on something out of the scouts' control, but man does Calgary look like a bit of a management train wreck in hindsight.