[agulati]

That seems weird. If a team has a couple of 5th round picks (their own and an acquired one) as opposed to one, they traded something in order to get that. I see the logic of if they only have an acquired one, because they traded their one away, so it is a wash.

In the end it isn’t a huge thing I get it, but it definitely doesn’t feel like an equitable solution. The way I think it should be (and I believe we had discussed this when the rule change had also been proposed) is if a team has an extra 5th, they should get the pick at the end of the 4th round.

Magic beans can grow something. I don’t want to miss out on a Cameron whynot.