With the small sample size we have I like him better than Kylington right now. Both potentially have room to grow with missing significant time but Kylington particularly struggled whereas Miromanov seems like a solid top 4 player on this roster now. It's interesting to see perspective like he might be at best a #5 or someone even said if we're lucky a #7. He was better than that in the games he played for us so what do you even mean? those games were invalid?
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by JobHopper
The thing is, my posts, thoughts and insights may be my opinions but they're also quite factual.
|
|