Quote:
Originally Posted by cannon7
Which data point was that? That he was "relatively sheltered"? My data point was he saw almost no time shorthanded, averaging 3 seconds a game. I posit there is some subjectivity to "relatively sheltered". But some claim there is an official NHL definition that exists somewhere maybe.
|
Dude man, just take the L. Not playing shorthanded means being sheltered is a weak argument when all his other 5 on 5 stats show otherwise. Seems like your mind is already made up regardless of facts and stats proving you wrong. So is there even any more point in providing further stats that refute your argument? It doesn't seem like you are open to changing your mind once you are dead set on it.