Quote:
Originally Posted by Claeren
** SPOILER ALERT **
I can only take so much "Oh shoot, i guess i will quickly and unexpectedly pull out my laptop in the middle of a casino and take 2 minutes to hack into the FBI(?) computer system, despite not being the 'computer guy', and then alter the appearance of 12(?) known criminals in real time without anyone noticing." Which if it had been part of the plan to get arrested, as it seemed to have been, should have been done ahead of time - not to mention the fact that changing the appearences of criminals would have come in handy LONG before actually needed!
Or "Hey, one state of the art boring machine broke down lets just bring in another without anyone noticing anything!!" which was absurd WITHOUT even thinking about the fact that the Chunnel machines are (1) COMPLETELY different from each other, (2) too huge to transport and (3) are still buried under the English Channel - or the fact they had ONE guy operating the entire thing.
etc etc. It was silly.... (and not good silly)
** END SPOILER ALERT **
|
As I said, if I wanted to, I could pick that movie to pieces from a technical stand point, but I could do that with every movie made. That is what movies do, is stretch the realms of what is believeable. But hey, you do have to realize that the majority of America do not believe in evolution and do believe in intelligent design/creationism (cross threading I know), so any of this stuff is in the realms of possibility to the average movie goer. The huge leaps in logic is what makes these movies fun to go see, and I saw no more leaps in logic in this one than existed in the first one.