Quote:
Originally Posted by RougeUnderoos
I don't have a "success barometer" and I know eradication is impossible so I'm afraid that particularly clever little set-up you arranged for me there isn't going to work.
|
Clever? I thought I had made it blatantly obvious. I'll have to be more obvious next time...
Unfortunately for you, I don't give up that easy. If you don't have a "success barometer", you surely would at least have a goal.... whether the goal is "no drug use", "maintain current drug use levels", "complete drug use by everyone", or whatever.
Quote:
Originally Posted by RougeUnderoos
What they've been doing about this "problem" does not work, yet you poo poo safe-injection sites and decriminalization out of hand. You even make a joke of the idea. At least they are different than the whole "failed miserably" results of the WAR ON DRUGS and isn't "different" better than the old "failed miserably" way of doing things?.
|
"Different" isn't always better. If different was always better, we'd all be cheering for different NHL teams every year.
Taking care of those that are already hooked on drugs is definitely something "different" that is needed. To me, safe-injections sites do not do this. They just promote drug use. Sure it means that they have a "safer" place to shoot up, but I don't see how that minimizes drug use. From your opposition to this thought, I can see that drug use isn't a problem to you....