Quote:
Originally Posted by #-3
I think the real challenge is that there are a bunch of concrete examples of pretty good things that have come out of the Biden administration. And you ignore / brush aside those things saying "I don't believe it's him in control".
Basically your argument leaves 2 options,
Option A, your argument is wrong, he is able to be effective at his job, maybe 50 years of experience and the confidence to delegate affords him a lighter work schedule than Obama, maybe as Trump proved (by spending 40% of his presidency and vacation homes and golf course) the earlier guys were just workaholics who didn't need to be as hands on as they thought.
Option B, there is a team behind Biden guiding a lot of his choices, and the are being sound and reasonable with their guidance, which isn't really a bad thing for the world. Not a perfect analogy, but when a minor ascended a throne typically a regent would be appointed to manage, and a good regent is a good thing.
Either way, if you aren't going to argue the results over the past 4 years, why are you hung up on a single possible cause among many probable causes of the results.
|
One and the most likely one given he is 80 is very undemocratic. As to why is he a bad candidate if the results have been good? Because he 81. No 81 year old is suitable to run the US for the next 4 years. Not to mention he leaves himself open to the attack by very rational people questioning if he’s suitable for office because he is 81.