Quote:
Originally Posted by ForeverFlameFan
Disagree, the goalie market shifts to Saros (if available) and Ullmark. They’ll dictate the goalie market. They both were not traded because both are in a playoff spot, with Nashville relying heavily on Saros and Boston keeping Ullmark because a) he didn’t waive and b) they are fine rolling with their tandem into the playoffs.
If you’re a GM, I think you go after those two before Markstrom. Cost/benefit analysis though could show Markstrom would have the higher demand because he wouldn’t cost nearly as much as the other two, especially Saros.
|
Considering the fact that Nashville is firmly in a playoff spot, why would Nashville even trade Saros?
And if you take Seravilli at his word, sounds like Boston did trade Ulmark despite being a playoff team, it was Ulmark that refused to go.