View Single Post
Old 03-17-2024, 03:56 PM   #833
Hackey
#1 Goaltender
 
Hackey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CliffFletcher View Post
Several insiders reported that Conroy had a deal he liked but it was nixed by someone higher up over retention. We don’t know to what extent that means the money itself or the compensation for retention. I suspect it was both at work - Edwards/Bean don’t like paying millions to people who aren’t working for them, and so Maloney pushed Conroy to ask for more in compensation.

There were also multiple reports that a week to 10 days later the Devils came back with a revised offer that didn’t include salary retention. The reason the Flames turned this down is murkier. It could have been that the revised deal didn’t offer enough hockey value. But we do have reports from Freidman that this second deal was nixed by ownership out of hopes of making the playoffs.

The fact the Flames dealt Hanifin after that date does not invalidate this conjecture. Hanifin was a pending UFA. And the Flames made multiple pitches to re-sign him. They only dealt Hanifin once they had no choice. That’s not the case at all with Markstrom. He’s not a ‘deal him or lose him for nothing’ asset like Hanifin was.

This is all speculative enough that people can believe what they want. Personally, given the track record of this franchise, I have an easier time believing ownership pulled the plug on a deal that Conroy liked than I have believing that several NHL insiders were all manipulated into carrying water for the Devils.
Obviously it's all speculation, but something along these lines makes most sense to me based on what we know. The higher ups either didn't like the dollar amount in retention or didn't like the value of the package based on what was being retained. This is what killed the deal when it was close. This is what angered Jersey and made them walk away. This is what annoyed Markstrom because he thought the deal was basically done. This is why Jersey came back and said we're taking the retention off the deal because it was likely the sticking point originally.

Any other theory doesn't make sense. I can't see a deal getting close and Conroy just changing his mind and demanding more. I can't see Markstrom going out of his way to call out management if he never thought the deal was close or he was mad info got leaked when that happens all the time in sports. I don't see Jersey coming back and saying no retention is needed now if that wasn't a sticking point to begin with.

Whats more likely? That the Flames higher ups got involved when they have a reputation of doing so or every insider is just some pawn of the Devils who are spreading all these false rumors in the media on their behalf?
Hackey is offline   Reply With Quote