Quote:
Originally Posted by Jiri Hrdina
If you want to provide an alternative actual analysis please go ahead.
Otherwise your view is simply an application of your own biases, and based on an even more flawed and limited data set.
I've provided data.
You can counter with actual data.
|
I haven’t seen another study, but this one is flawed. They discount one team cause “too many early picks” and then prop another up because “not enough picks”. Flawed method, not bias. That analysis is actually a great example of manipulating data find a desired outcome. I wish there were more studies of drafting, but I think you only need to see the impact of drafted players on their organizations to figure out who is good and who is bad. Winning is the greater indicator of success.