View Single Post
Old 03-11-2024, 03:40 PM   #265
stemit14
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Cobra View Post
That is not consistent with the flames retooling.

Moving Andersson weakens an already very weak dmen group.
Maybe. It depends on what flames management think of their future options with Andersson. He’ll be 30 when he needs a new deal and he’s a very valuable asset right now. Conroy has just experienced how difficult it is to get a team to give up a top prospect when trading a rental defenceman. If they keep Andersson and he does not want to re-sign in 2 years, Conroy will be trying at that point to get a player like one that gets picked at 10th-12th overall in this draft… and it’s very unlikely a team will give that up for a rental. However, he has a chance to get that player now for Andersson with 2 years left on his deal.

All depends on if the flames think Andersson will re-sign in 2 years and if they see him as an impact player in his 30s.
stemit14 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to stemit14 For This Useful Post: