Quote:
Originally Posted by Bonded
'Hostage' lol. Do you think Hanifin should have just signed with the team that would offer the most in order to benefit the Flames or should he have lied and said he'd be open to re-signing and then bail on the acquiring team?
I don't remember hearing Stone or H Lindholm holding their teams hostage when they had a preference on where they wanted to sign.
|
In the article it referenced holding the Flames hostage.
Hanifin's agent was calling teams back in the summer saying not to trade for him which is why the market for him was not the best.