Quote:
Originally Posted by Bingo
If the retool means moving draft capital for guys that are older and need to be re-signed it's a disaster.
If it's to bring in 22-24 year old players with term and talent it's not.
I think fans over react to the terms being used. I'm sure out of 4 hockey executives one of them will bring up the downside of being in the first lane.
|
Agree.
The only thing I can really think about why ownership would want to muzzle the use of the phrase re-build is that it might push them into committing to truly large investments like say... construction of a new arena.
That ship is sailing, so I truly don't understand the aversion to using the term.