Quote:
Originally Posted by bluejays
He certainly can be but just based on that it doesn’t mean he’s out to lunch. In this case the fingers seem to be pointing to ownership intervention. Would that at all be surprising?
|
No, it wouldn't be surprising.
However, citing "winning games" as the reason for the trade pull is careless reporting IMO. It doesn't take long to look at the losing streak to prove that clearly wasn't the case