Quote:
Originally Posted by OILFAN #81
I’d do a 1st straight up. Not ready to give up on Holloway yet for a rental. Calgary might get more than a 1st for Tanev but that’s what I would be comfortable sending.
|
I struggle to see Tanev’s value stretching to include a 1st + Holloway.
If we’re to look at Ben Chiarot as the market defining trade on this front, that was a 1st + 4th.
We can argue Tanev > Chiarot, but at the same time in recent years Chiarot is probably the best comparable - that then poses the question of what is Holloway worth? If we were to look back at Curtis Lazar as a comparable then that’s a 2nd round pick, is that a fair comparison?
1st + Holloway = 1st + 2nd in my eyes, and I don’t think Tanev holds that sort of value - even with an in-province premium attached.