Quote:
Originally Posted by Matt Reeeeead
To me it was arrogant to point to the initial 1-6 record and 2 points in 7 games as being justification. That you were correct, and then when the same metrics became opposite, and no longer align with your take, it’s painted as luck and unsustainable.
You can’t just pick and choose when the same data points are valid and when they can be written off as noise. It proves your bias, and underlying motive. Consistency is key.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
|
Well… they are 7-2-1 in their last 10 (Kane with 12pts in 8games) and he’s still calling him ineffective. That’s pretty consistent.