Quote:
Originally Posted by Enoch Root
Yeah, that's wildly optimistic.
For Markstrom and Tanev, both retained, a great return would be Mercer, Casey and a 1st.
No need to push for quantity, this return is all quality.
|
No I think a little more is justified. My thought is that the Flames want 2nd + asset for Tanev and the Markstrom deal was Mercer + 1st without factoring in retention and the hitch was the valuation on the retention. So you add tanev to the deal get the 2nd and the + asset is the difference between the Flames and devils valuation of the retention. I don't think we need to retain on Tanev.
Makes sense to me.