[PepsiFree]

Originally Posted by Beninho

If the allegations are real of course they should be investigated but it is interesting that both of you are so critical of “biased” Israeli sources but believe the UN, who has funded Hamas terrorism, is a trustworthy source.

…

The UN is Hamas’s no.1 spokesperson

Turns out, probably not.

According to the Wall Street Journal, the intelligence report, released last week, declared it had “low confidence” in the basic claim that a handful of staff had participated in the attack, indicating that it considered the accusations to be credible though it could not independently confirm their veracity.

It cast doubt, however, on accusations that the UN agency was collaborating with Hamas in a wider way. The Journal said the report mentioned that although the UNRWA does coordinate with Hamas in order to deliver aid and operate in the region, there was a lack of evidence to suggest it partnered with the group.

It added that Israel has not “shared the raw intelligence behind its assessments with the US”.

In addition, the report notes Israel’s dislike towards the UNRWA, two sources familiar with it told the Journal. “There is a specific section that mentions how Israeli bias serves to mischaracterize much of their assessments on UNRWA and says this has resulted in distortions,” one source reportedly said.

https://amp.theguardian.com/world/20...ce-unrwa-hamas

I’m not sure supporters of the Israel government should be so quick to point “Hamas” at everything given the government they support had a significant role in building up Hamas to ensure instability in the region.