Quote:
Originally Posted by Bonded
It is a rental trade. The most likely scenario is that the Canucks don't end up with a cup and the Flames end up with some busts. You are making is sound like the Forsberg/Erat trade. No need to make it sound worse for the Canucks than it is. Same as the Rikster guy downplaying what the Canucks paid
|
If firsts are most likely busts we should trade them all I guess
Flames will most likely get at least one good player out of this deal