Quote:
Originally Posted by TrentCrimmIndependent
That was not discussing the case involving Lucic. That was a post building off the tangent discussion that was irrelevant to this case, regarding posters claiming they dated compulsive liars and Pepsi's funny remark about taking anecdotal accounts as gospel.
Work on your reading comprehension. This jumping to conclusions without reading the chronological posts thoroughly enough to grasp the context gets silly sometimes.
As for this case, I don't think we can say anything definitively because it was dropped and you can't convict people based off a police testimony (where, as another poster pointed out, anything can be said) but if I were a betting man I'd say he ####ed up and she did what other victims unfortunately do and dropped charged once asked to testify. I don't think this was nothing or theatrics, and I feel for her, but even more so the kids.
|
5/7 posts, including the 3 immediately before yours were talking directly about the Lucic case. The other 2 were space jokes. Then before that there was some talk of dementia...
So I guess it's that well adjusted people don't end up with people who end up having dementia? Or is it that the posters talking about difficult experiences with past partners must themselves not be well adjusted? I think you'll have to spell it out for me because apparently my reading comprehension is just that bad that I have no idea what point you're trying to make or what thread you were picking up?